The Pyeongyang Olympics: Mirage or Miracle
Recent talks on the Korean Peninsula have led some to believe that denuclearization can be spurred on by sports. Optimism may provoke that sort of statement; a realists’ view evokes a very different answer.
On January 9th, South Korea and North Korea concluded talks, resulting in a plan to send 550-member delegation of North Koreans to the 2018 Pyeongchang Olympic Winter Games. North Korea has agreed to send athletes, officials, and a cheerleading squad.
The two countries will even enter the Olympic ceremony under a unified flag.
More importantly, these talks spark a return to communication after almost two years of silence. This comes on the heels of the most unstable year on the Korean Peninsula since 1969, when North Korea shot done a US aircraft and boarded a US ship.
The Cold War significantly impacted North Korea, especially in regards to its relations with its southern neighbor – the Republic of Korea. Since then, the two countries are still technically at war and neither recognizes the other as a legitimate, sovereign state.
North Korea’s relations are even worse with the United States. Since the United States entered the peninsula in 1945, North Korea has seen it as their ultimate adversary, blaming it for the division of Korea.
Since then, North Korea has notoriously breached multiple agreements with the United States and South Korea even when relations seem to be improving. Most prominently, North Korea’s nuclear proliferation has increasingly isolated it from all states involved, including its allies.
To properly understand the ramifications (or lack thereof) from the Olympic Games, one must remember North Korea’s increasing instability and hostility.
While the headlines of North Korea participating in the Olympics and walking unified with South Korea may encourage some, the results will be minimal. Experts were quick to comment that North Korea tends to talk when they need money, and South Korea typically pays for these sorts of agreements.
Furthermore, Kim Jung-un has made it vehemently clear that nuclearization is the only way to protect itself. During his New Year’s address, he proclaimed that “[the United States] will not dare to invade us because we currently have a powerful nuclear deterrent”.
That said the fact that communication has been established cannot be overstated. In one metric Korean relations are better than they have been in two years and President Moon is warmer to negotiations than his impeached predecessor.
Additionally, the same man who once said he would unleash “fire and fire like the world has never seen” on North Korea, has even taken a different tone, at least for the moment. The United States has agreed to postpone regular joint military exercises with South Korea until the games conclude.
These talks pose a dichotomy between North Korea as a reneging and seemingly irrational actor and talks as being a slight glimmer of hope for all involved. If the communication is genuine, they could act as a catalyst for a freeze for freeze agreement. This would result in the US and South Korea halting its military exercises and North Korea discontinuing its nuclearization program.
Currently, both the United States’ alliance and China believe that denuclearization is the only option and once freeze for freeze is established, denuclearization talks can begin.
On the other hand, if communication is not genuine and North Korea is only using the opportunity for cash, legitimacy, and some respect on the international stage, then the United States may coerce South Korea back into military aggression.
Donald Trump may use North Korea’s deceit to evoke even more aggression, which North Korea would ultimately counter. This could escalate into a pre-emptive strike by the United States.
This option has been touted by most to be absolutely disastrous. While the supporters of it emphasize a ‘bloody nose’ strike: the United States would destroy all of North Korea’s launching sites, deterring it from retaliating at all.
Yet, it would be unlikely to destroy every one, and North Korea, feeling an existential crisis may still attack. Even if this attack were conventional, North Korea could kill upwards of 300 000 South Koreans in a matter of days due to Seoul’s close proximity to the Korean Demilitarized Zone.
Yet, these pre-emptive strikes seem too risky and the goal of denuclearization has failed for over 25 years. One theory that seems much more plausible and peaceful is nonproliferation. This builds from a freeze for freeze agreement to arms controls measures that would allow North Korea to exist as a nuclear power, but would be subject to inspections and restrictions on continued testing of their technologies.
Moreover, this would stabilize the Korean peninsula and prevent North Korea from selling its technologies to other United States’ adversaries. The United States has dealt with a nuclear Russia and China; there is no reason why it cannot live with a nuclear North Korea.
Ultimately, the consequences of North Korea’s participation in the Olympics will not be understood until long after the games have concluded. Renewed communication does provide positivity, but not optimism, North Korea is far too unpredictable to trust yet.